This shared neurobiological basis demonstrates the value of personality research in elucidating processes associated with mental disorders. In humans, individual variation across personality traits have been found to associate with mental health outcomes often times via common neurobiological processes. Personality research seeks to identify and understand underlying process associated with individual differences in dispositional traits. As a result, there is good reason for clinical and comparative psychologists to collaborate to ameliorate aberrant behaviors while creating conditions that enable all captive animals to thrive. Felids, ursids, elephants and cetaceans have also suffered this fate.
#Mystera legacy burst damage how to
We know how to prevent psychopathology in monkeys and apes but nonhuman primates are still confined in restricted, substandard facilities that introduce trauma and suffering. Following Harlow’s practice of using human models to design monkey studies, present day psychologists apply what is known about maladaptive behavior and the factors that facilitate positive human behavior to improve the quality of life for non-human taxa living in captive settings. Maslow developed a “Hierarchy of Needs” and the hypothetical construct of self-actualization. Years later, working with human subjects in his clinical practice, Harlow’s first graduate student, A.H. Harlow induced aberrant behaviors in rhesus macaques, collaborators began the search for effective behavioral and psychopharmacological interventions. The animal welfare movement was empowered by decades of animal studies focused on the ontogeny of psychopathology in non-human primates and other species.
#Mystera legacy burst damage professional
It is hoped that the important articles included in this special issue will help spark further discussion of how these two fields can again collaborate for mutual professional benefit and for the benefit for the general public. That collaboration has slowed considerably in the past several decades and this has coincided with increased specialization and compartmentalization throughout psychology. For much of the first half of the last century there was a clear collaboration between the two fields that was fueled by motivation to find the best ways of understanding psychological processes. Freud referenced Darwin’s work throughout his work and Skinner’s research was almost exclusively comparative psychology research.
![mystera legacy burst damage mystera legacy burst damage](https://cdn.rpg.rip/client/q_glossy,ret_img,w_300/https://rpg.rip/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/rotmg-bow-of-covert-havens-300x303.png)
![mystera legacy burst damage mystera legacy burst damage](https://rpg.rip/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Inventory_Weapenchant_Bileton_T13_01.png)
Prominent names throughout psychology have work that crosses over between these two fields. These two fields have a shared history going back to the beginnings of each. This article serves as the introduction to the special issues of the International Journal of Comparative Psychology on the intersection of comparative and clinical psychology.